Billionaire investor Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, has issued a stark warning about the future of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), saying widespread adoption is likely and could come with sweeping implications for financial privacy and individual freedom.
Dalio made his remarks during a recent interview on The Tucker Carlson Show, where he discussed how CBDCs — digital forms of national fiat currency issued and controlled by central banks — could give governments unprecedented access and control over people’s money.
CBDCs Poised to Replace Cash — But at What Cost?
According to Dalio, CBDCs are “inevitable,” and nations will eventually adopt them due to their convenience and efficiency in facilitating digital payments. However, he cautioned that such systems could nearly eliminate financial privacy, allowing authorities to track every transaction made with these digital currencies.
“There will be no privacy, and it’s a very effective controlling mechanism by the government,” Dalio said of CBDCs, noting that all transactions “will be known.”
Under a CBDC regime, Dalio warned, governments could use these digital currencies to:
- Tax individuals more directly and efficiently, removing barriers to taxation that exist in the current cash-centric system.
- Seize or freeze funds without legal or judicial processes typically required under existing banking systems.
- Enforce foreign exchange controls, potentially restricting how and where money is used.
- Cut off access to funds for political opponents or dissenters, since governments would have complete visibility and control over CBDC transactions.
Tucker Carlson — the host of the interview — echoed these concerns, suggesting that CBDCs might be used as tools to “shut off” individuals from financial systems for political reasons, a notion Dalio agreed could be possible.
CBDCs vs. Traditional Money and Cash
Central bank digital currencies differ from physical cash and decentralized cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin in that they are fully centralized and controllable by government authorities. Cash transactions today can occur anonymously, and even bank accounts generally require legal oversight before access can be restricted. CBDCs, by contrast, would be programmable and fully traceable at the transaction level.
Advocates of CBDCs argue they can improve payment efficiency, lower transaction costs and facilitate financial inclusion. However, critics — including Dalio and other financial commentators — fear these benefits may come at the cost of individual autonomy, privacy and civil liberties.
Global Context: CBDC Development Worldwide
CBDCs are already being piloted or developed in many countries. According to research, dozens of nations are exploring digital currencies, and some — including the Bahamas and Nigeria — have launched functioning systems. Critics highlight that widespread adoption could create mechanisms for financial surveillance and control if robust privacy protections are not built into the systems.
Policy and Debate
In the United States, political responses have been mixed. In January 2025, an executive order was signed banning federal agencies from establishing, issuing or circulating a U.S. CBDC, citing concerns over financial stability, privacy and national sovereignty.
Despite that, Dalio and others believe global monetary trends and technological developments will push central banks toward digital alternatives to physical cash. The debate continues over how to balance innovation with privacy safeguards and individual rights.
Also Check: Tom Lee’s BitMine Boosts Treasury With Another ~40,000 ETH Purchase Worth ~$83 Million
