Blockchain-intelligence firm Arkham Intelligence said it has begun indexing Zcash on its platform and now labels about 53% of Zcash transactions (including both shielded and transparent activity), attributing roughly $420 billion of transaction volume to identifiable individuals and institutions. Arkham also reported that 48% of transaction inputs and outputs and 37% of on-chain balances (about $2.5 billion) can be linked to entities on its platform.
Key facts
- Arkham published an announcement on December 8 saying Zcash data is now live on Arkham Intel and listing the main metrics: 53% of Zcash transactions labeled; $420B of volume attributed; 48% of inputs/outputs attributed; 37% of balances labeled (~$2.5B).
- Multiple crypto news aggregators and exchange newsfeeds reported Arkham’s claims shortly after the announcement, amplifying the figures to a wider audience.
- Arkham says its product can visualize transactions and entity networks on Zcash, surface AI-driven insights, set alerts for large activity and let researchers track large ZEC holders in real time.
Why this is notable
Zcash is a privacy-focused blockchain that offers optional “shielded” transactions designed to hide sender, recipient and amount details from public view. Tools that can attribute even a portion of activity on privacy chains raise questions about how much privacy is preserved in practice, and they can affect regulatory scrutiny, exchange behaviour and institutional risk assessments. Arkham’s figures — if interpreted as showing broad linkability — would represent a meaningful advance in chain-analysis coverage for a protocol built explicitly around privacy.
What Arkham says it did
In its blog post Arkham said it has labeled “more than half” of Zcash’s shielded and unshielded transactions and is surfacing entity profiles, large-holder tracking and network visualizations on Arkham Intel. The firm positioned the release as customers’ ability to “track Zcash transactions, entities and balances on Arkham” and to use the platform’s filters, alerts and dashboards for real-time monitoring.
Pushback and nuance from the Zcash community
Prominent figures in the Zcash ecosystem and privacy advocates were quick to push back on headlines calling Arkham’s work a full “deanonymization.” Zcash founder Zooko Wilcox-O’Hearn and other community members argued Arkham’s labeling should not be equated with breaking Zcash’s cryptography — shielded pool holdings by design cannot be trivially read or reconstructed from chain data alone — and stressed the distinction between linking activity to observed on-chain patterns and mathematically undermining shielded privacy guarantees.
Independent context and technical caveats
- Shielded vs transparent: Zcash supports both transparent (public) and shielded (private) transactions. Shielded transactions are explicitly designed so third parties cannot see amounts or addresses; attribution in many cases comes from linking activity at the boundaries (when users move funds between shielded and transparent pools) or by correlating cluster behaviour. Arkham’s announcement does not claim it has defeated the cryptographic protections of fully shielded pools.
- Base effects and figures: Percentages (e.g., 53% labeled) are easier to state than the methods and thresholds used for labeling. Analysts caution that on privacy chains, a relatively small amount of identifiable on-chain plumbing (exchanges, custodians, government seizures, known deposit addresses) often explains a large share of measurable volume and balances. Arkham’s figures are therefore significant but should be read with attention to methodology.
Market and policy reactions
News and exchange feeds covering the Arkham announcement helped push the story into wider market discussion, alongside a surge of commentary on social media about whether privacy coins remain as private as intended. Some traders and institutional actors may treat Zcash exposures differently if they believe a greater share of activity is linkable to entities; regulators and compliance teams also watch such developments closely. Meanwhile, privacy proponents continue to argue that user-side practices and protocol improvements are the correct responses to mitigate linkability.
Bottom line
Arkham’s rollout of Zcash monitoring — and its headline statistics (53% of transactions labeled, $420 billion of volume attributed, 48% of inputs/outputs and 37% of balances tagged) — is an important development for on-chain intelligence and for debates about privacy-focused blockchains. The announcement demonstrates the increasing reach of chain-analysis tools, but it does not, by itself, prove cryptographic failure of Zcash’s shielded pools. Independent technical review, transparent methodology disclosure and measured reporting will be needed to fully assess the scope and implications of Arkham’s claims.
Also Check: OCC’s Jonathan Gould says crypto firms seeking federal charters should be treated like banks