Longtime Bitcoin critic and economist Peter Schiff has renewed his criticism of the world’s largest cryptocurrency, arguing that tokenized gold—rather than Bitcoin—is the true form of “digital gold.”
In a recent post on X, Schiff claimed that blockchain-based gold combines the historical stability of physical gold with the efficiency of modern digital assets, saying:
“Tokenized gold solves all the problems Bitcoin pretended to solve but can’t. If you want to know what digital gold is, it’s tokenized gold. It’s not Bitcoin.”
His comments come as interest in real-world asset (RWA) tokenization continues to grow, with financial institutions increasingly exploring blockchain-based versions of commodities, bonds, equities, and other traditional assets.
Schiff’s Argument: Gold Plus Blockchain
Schiff has long argued that physical gold is a superior store of value compared with Bitcoin.
Now, he says tokenization removes many of gold’s traditional disadvantages.
According to Schiff, tokenized gold offers:
- Digital ownership backed by physical bullion.
- Faster global transfers using blockchain technology.
- Fractional ownership.
- Lower settlement times.
- Easier accessibility than transporting physical gold.
He argues that this combination delivers the benefits often promoted by Bitcoin advocates without abandoning gold’s long-established monetary role.
What Is Tokenized Gold?
Tokenized gold represents ownership of physical gold through blockchain-based digital tokens.
Each token is typically backed by a specified amount of physical gold held in secure vaults by custodians.
Popular examples include:
- PAX Gold (PAXG), where each token represents one fine troy ounce of London Good Delivery gold.
- Tether Gold (XAUT), another blockchain-based token backed by physical bullion.
Unlike cryptocurrencies whose value depends entirely on market demand, tokenized gold derives its price from the underlying precious metal while benefiting from blockchain-based settlement and transfer capabilities.
Bitcoin Supporters Strongly Disagree
Schiff’s latest comments quickly drew criticism from Bitcoin supporters.
Many argued that tokenized gold still depends on:
- Centralized custodians.
- Vault operators.
- Issuers.
- Regulatory oversight.
- Trust in third parties.
Bitcoin, by contrast, operates through a decentralized network without requiring investors to trust a central institution holding underlying assets.
Supporters also argue that Bitcoin offers:
- A fixed maximum supply of 21 million coins.
- Resistance to censorship.
- Permissionless global transfers.
- Self-custody.
- Independence from governments and financial institutions.
Tokenized Gold Is Growing Alongside RWAs
Although Schiff remains skeptical of Bitcoin, his comments reflect growing institutional interest in real-world asset tokenization.
Financial institutions are increasingly bringing traditional assets onto blockchain networks, including:
- Gold.
- U.S. Treasury securities.
- Money market funds.
- Equities.
- Real estate.
- Private credit.
Industry analysts view tokenization as one of blockchain’s fastest-growing sectors because it can improve settlement efficiency while maintaining exposure to familiar financial assets.
Gold and Bitcoin Continue to Attract Different Investors
Despite frequent comparisons, gold and Bitcoin often appeal to different types of investors.
Gold has served as a store of value for thousands of years and remains widely held by central banks and institutional investors.
Bitcoin, meanwhile, is often viewed as a digital alternative due to its scarcity, decentralized design, and growing institutional adoption through exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and corporate treasury strategies.
Some investors choose to hold both assets as part of diversified portfolios rather than treating them as direct competitors.
The Digital Gold Debate Continues
The phrase “digital gold” has long been associated with Bitcoin because of its fixed supply and perceived scarcity.
Schiff argues that tokenized gold deserves that label instead because it combines blockchain technology with ownership of a tangible asset that has historically preserved purchasing power.
Bitcoin advocates counter that simply placing gold on a blockchain does not eliminate the need for trusted custodians, making tokenized gold fundamentally different from Bitcoin’s decentralized architecture.
Growing Competition in Tokenized Commodities
The debate comes as tokenized commodity markets continue expanding.
Several fintech firms and blockchain companies are developing platforms that allow investors to trade tokenized versions of gold and other precious metals around the clock.
Supporters believe these products can bridge traditional finance and decentralized finance by making commodity ownership more accessible while leveraging blockchain infrastructure.
Looking Ahead
Peter Schiff’s latest remarks underscore the widening discussion over what constitutes the best long-term store of value in the digital age.
While Schiff believes tokenized gold offers the ideal combination of blockchain technology and physical asset backing, Bitcoin supporters maintain that decentralization, scarcity, and censorship resistance remain Bitcoin’s defining strengths.
As institutional interest grows in both cryptocurrencies and tokenized real-world assets, the debate over whether Bitcoin or tokenized gold deserves the title of “digital gold” is likely to continue.
Also Check: Robinhood CEO Unveils Vision for Robinhood Chain as Platform for Tokenized Real-World Assets
