Why Montana Lawmakers Rejected the Bitcoin Reserve Bill
Montana’s House of Representatives has voted down House Bill No. 429, which aimed to include Bitcoin as part of the state’s financial reserves. On February 22, lawmakers rejected the bill in a 41-59 vote, citing concerns over financial risks and the use of taxpayer money for volatile investments. Despite initial approval from the House Business and Labor Committee, the bill ultimately failed to gain enough support on the House floor. This decision has quickly gained attention in crypto news.
Key Reasons the Montana Bitcoin Bill Failed
The primary reason lawmakers rejected the bill was skepticism about using public funds to invest in Bitcoin. Representative Steven Kelly emphasized the responsibility of managing taxpayer dollars, stating, “It’s still taxpayer money, and we’re responsible for it.” Many legislators were uneasy about the unpredictable nature of Bitcoin and digital assets in general.
Additionally, some lawmakers opposed the bill’s provision that would allow investments in assets like NFTs. A proposed amendment to fund the bill using interest from ARPA (American Rescue Plan Act) instead of the General Fund was also rejected, as legislators questioned whether those funds could be legally allocated for such use. This lack of clear financial oversight contributed to the bill’s failure.
What Was House Bill No. 429 About?
House Bill No. 429 proposed allowing Montana to invest in Bitcoin, stablecoins, and precious metals through a dedicated revenue account. The goal was to diversify state investments and potentially generate greater financial returns for taxpayers. The bill primarily focused on Bitcoin, as it is the only cryptocurrency that meets the $750 billion market cap requirement.
Had it passed, Montana would have joined states like Utah, Arizona, and Texas, which are actively exploring crypto-based reserve funds. The topic of state-level Bitcoin reserves continues to be a major trend in the cryptocurrency market.
Could Montana Reconsider a Bitcoin Reserve Bill?
While this version of the bill is off the table, supporters believe a revised proposal could emerge in the future. If lawmakers can address concerns over funding sources and regulatory oversight, Montana might reconsider adopting Bitcoin as part of its financial strategy. Across the U.S., at least 24 states have discussed the possibility of creating Bitcoin reserves, with Utah leading the way. Montana could still follow suit with a better-structured plan.
Impact on Crypto Regulations in the U.S.
Montana’s decision highlights the ongoing7 debate over cryptocurrency in state finance. While some states see digital assets as an opportunity to strengthen their financial reserves, others remain cautious due to market volatility. This latest development has sparked discussions across the crypto industry, leaving many to wonder how state-level digital asset policies will evolve.
One thing is certain—the conversation about Bitcoin and state investments is far from over.
Also Read:
- Zoo Listing Date Nears: Claim $ZOO Token with Zero Gas Fees Today
- DOGEN Crypto Surges 90% in 24 Hours: $DOGEN Value Soars
- Bondex Crypto Increases Community Reward by 67% Ahead of Q1 2025 Listing
- Blum Airdrop Listing Date Approaches: What Will $BLUM Coin Price Be?
- Costa Rica to Launch First Bitcoin ETF with BN Fondos
- W-Coin Launch: Listing, Airdrop, TGE, Price & Key Details
- PAWS Airdrop Allocation Checker Live: Is $PAWS Listing Coming Soon?